Allow upgrades of systems you own using loyalty points.

Losing mission agent access is totally fine, thats the kind of thing that SHOULD be involved here.

But having to leave FW for a day is totally stupid. It's immersion breaking and many of us don't want long in / out corp histories. We take pride in long term consistency.

Also, hassling with alts is not a big deal for us veterans, but I agree with Bloodpetal in as much that we cannot simply think about ourselves here.

My big concern is not just for the vets, its for new players. When I first started FW, I spent a whole day fitting 12 rifters and flying them to Auga. I had no hauler or knowledge about how to haul safely in low sec, I just wanted to get started in PvP without cross training too much. I would have raged if I had woke up to have all that work go to waste, and I do NOT want young pilots to face that kind of frustration. So yes, X, I do think it is a big deal.

It also just makes no sense to have a blanket no dock rule over the whole system. 24th may not allow TLF to dock, that makes sense, but Quafe stations locking militia pilots out does not.

The problem is that, there would become a focus in FW for getting around the system, through use of alts, or leaving FW, etc, as you say.

Would you really prefer messing with alts all the time, moving crap around, rather then focusing on actually pvping and playing the game?

I

If you are concerned about the new players and logistics, perhaps consider what goes on with new -10s in pirate corps. Most if not all of the established pirate corps have there own logistics chains, doing regular runs to and from trade hubs, to keep there members supplied. Thinking less about yourselves (the vets) is probably good advice.

I was under the impression that the Victory Points will be phased out completely and everything will be dealt with LP. If you get more of them - from kills, plexes, upgrade bonuses it shouldn't be that much of a problem.

The FW missions should scale a bit better too, right now it's not even worth picking up a L1-L3 mission while they could open some interesting PvP situations (much like plexes).

[quote=X Gallentius]It's good to have another sink for them, rather than using them exclusively to pull out insane amounts of navy ships/modules/implants out of the store and screw around with the markets.
.

Because to avoid it you have to either a) introduce some secondary point system which is completely unnecessary

And what does this have to do with RF timers? This is just you disliking null and running away because "waaaah nullsec is coming at me, it's all gonna be nullsec". ;P

the after dt advance has been substantially reduced but it is still a 2-3 plexing hour advantage to whoever holds the DT-zone and the advantage needs to be completely removed.

Well, that's obvious. Everyone wants to fight when they're online. Problems like this are the price of Eve being one of the few single-shard MMO games.

But I still see a little contradiction in your reply.

How does the rapid response and quick action work if Gallente attack a system in USTZ? If, as you say, Caldari have no to little presence in that timezone, and can't respond with a similar force at all? Isn't that a big advantage for the attackers?

RL isn't a leg to stand on no.